The makeover

How the personal care industry is trying to avoid the environmental costs of palm oil found in so many of its products.

Sitting in the shade of an oil-palm grove in northern Malaysian Borneo, Linella Pallai, 47, and her friend Trisar Sarigoh, 52, are describing what it was like before palm-oil mania swept their country. As children, the two women would gather fruit from the rain forest and fish from clear-running streams. But today, they tell me, the once-lush ecosystem feels like an endless sea of palm. They eat mostly processed food and are troubled by a dark haze that rolls in periodically from the Indonesian side of the island, where carbon-rich peatlands are burned to clear the land for new plantations. “Life here was very different,” Pallai acknowledges.

More on this story

These are just a few local consequences of the exploding global industry centered on the most versatile, least expensive vegetable oil in the world. As rain forests are cleared, natural habitats—including those once home to such endangered species as the orangutan—have been devastated. Harvesting and processing the spiky bunches of the oil-palm tree’s shiny, tangerine-colored fruit has been linked to massive greenhouse gas emissions, and labor and human rights abuses on plantations are not uncommon.

At a processing plant, oil-palm fruit is moved from collection bins into high-pressure steam chambers to remove impurities before being pressed.

An alternative to the artificial trans fats recently banned by the Food and Drug Administration, palm oil is in everything from cookies and ice cream to ramen noodles and protein bars. But its derivatives also lurk in an astounding 70 percent of our cosmetics, where they serve as emulsifiers and surfactants. Thanks largely to its complicated refining and manufacturing processes, the personal-care industry has managed to avoid fallout for any use of “conflict palm oil.” Now, however, as beauty obsessives demand transparency, major brands are beginning to rethink how they source the commodity.

AT THE BEAUTY COUNTER

The oils derived from the oil-palm plant, whether from the fruit’s pulp or its hard kernel, tend to undergo multiple processes before landing in our lipsticks and moisturizers. By the time they get there, they’ve taken on names like cetyl palmitate, stearic acid, and glyceryl stearate (to name a very few), rendering it nearly impossible for even the most assiduous ingredients-tracker to detect their presence.

The Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) oversees a certification scheme based on a set of environmental and social criteria, and though it is not yet well-established in this country, the organization recently hired its first U.S.-based representative for outreach and engagement, among whose goals is to change that. (The Kuala Lumpur–based nonprofit has been criticized for maintaining less-than-rigorous standards, but a representative said that it continues to tighten its methodology and enforcement practices.)

In the meantime, both Greenpeace and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) regularly publish palm oil scorecards rating food and personal-care brands based on how they source the commodity. Among the beauty brands featured in WWF’s 2016 ratings – based on nine criteria for commitments made, and actions taken, to source RSPO-certified oil—Colgate-Palmolive, Unilever and Estée Lauder all reached the highest score (9 out of 9), followed by Avon (8 out of 9), L’Oreal (8 out of 9), Johnson & Johnson (8 out of 9), and Shiseido (5 out of 9).

 

At Wilmar’s Sapi palm oil plantation, the men do all the cutting and harvesting, while the women fertilize the trees, or spray defoliant and pesticides.

I traveled 9,500 miles from Brooklyn to meet Pallai and Sarigoh, as they are participants in a new initiative aimed at helping independent farmers improve their growing practices to earn environmental certification—and the premiums such accreditation commands from big companies looking to clean up their operations. Coordinated by the Malaysian NGO Wild Asia, the project—Sustainable Palm Oil and Traceability with Sabah (SPOTS) small producers—has support from a champion in France: L’Oréal Paris. Among the initiative’s other partners is Singapore’s Wilmar International, the world’s largest palm oil trader, whose Borneo-based facilities and workers have been captured here—along with drone footage of clearing, much of it illegal, in nearby Sumatra—by the photographer George Steinmetz.

Palm oil harvesters and their families live in company-built housing at ISU plantation, where houses sit on stilts above the water. Palm oil extraction is a low wage, subsistence job for Indonesia’s rural poor.

About 98 percent of the 60,000 metric tons of palm-based derivatives that L’Oréal purchases each year comes from Malaysia and Indonesia, says Alexandra Palt, who oversees sustainability for the $27 billion beauty company. “Each of the mills that feeds our sourcing refineries gets fruit from scores of farmers,” she explains. If executed successfully, SPOTS, which hopes to add hundreds more farmers in the next few years, will help mitigate the side effects—including deforestation and labor abuses—of our reliance on the prodigious crop. The goal is one now shared by companies such as Estée Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive. Unilever, which buys more palm oil than most other consumer-goods conglomerates, for use in products like Dove soap and Pond’s cold cream, recently committed to tracing its entire supply by 2019.

Palm fruit being moves into high pressure steam chambers to remove impurities.

As Southeast Asia continues to balance the pros and cons of its booming industry, an upstart on the other side of the globe is forging a different sort of palm-oil future. Natural Habitats, an eight-year-old company based in the Netherlands, works with a network of family farms in Ecuador and Sierra Leone to produce, process, and trade organic palm oil. The outfit shuns all chemical inputs and requires its members to plant only on degraded land. It also encourages irrigating with harvested rainwater. Though only a fraction of its palm oil currently ends up in cosmetics and personal-care products (it’s a mainstay in Dr. Bronner’s soaps), Gay Timmons, the founder of California-based Oh Oh Organic, is confident there’s room for growth.

 

“I came back a convert,” says Timmons of a recent trip to Ecuador. The ivory-haired Berkeley native, whose company provides all-organic, responsibly sourced raw materials to such manufacturers as Au Naturale Cosmetics and True Botanicals, had previously avoided palm oil on account of its links to deforestation. Now the 62-year-old plans to team with Natural Habitats to develop sustainable palm oil–based surfactants and emulsifiers, which she believes will find a place in the thriving indie beauty market.

After 300 acres were deforested to make way for a palm oil plantation, the workers at first refused to say who owned the site, but eventually admitted it was a Dr. Dina who works at Boloni Hospital in Medan, Sumatra. They said the felled trees were to be burned as fertiliser before the new palms would be planted.

Though discussions about a boycott of palm-based raw materials occasionally bubble to the surface, the consensus these days is that such a move wouldn’t ultimately make sense. “The unintended consequences would be profoundly negative,” says Boris Oak, the founder and CEO of San Francisco’s EVOLVh Luxury Natural Haircare: a marketplace flooded with “the bad stuff,” not to mention hundreds of thousands of developing-world farmers deprived of their livelihoods. Higher numbers of educated consumers asking for sustainably produced oil, Oak says, would increase demand and lower its cost.

Plantation workers load just harvested clusters of palm nuts  into a transport bin at a plantation owned by Wilmar International — the world’s largest palm oil producer.

On her fifteen-acre Borneo farm, Linella Pallai now wears protective gloves, boots, and a mask, while also applying significantly smaller amounts of pesticides and fertilizers. Such SPOTS-inspired improvements have helped her yields—and her income—go steadily up. It’s low season during my visit, so she is taking in only about $350 a month, most of which is already spoken for, between the pair of farmhands she’s had to bring on and the school uniform and textbooks required for her high school–age daughter. As for the rest? That will go toward “the necessities,” she says: “clothes, food—and makeup.”

Produced with FERN, this story first appeared at Vogue. All rights reserved. This article may not be reproduced without express permission from FERN. If you are interested in republishing or reposting this article, please contact info@thefern.org. Support for FERN’s land use reporting is provided in part by a grant from The David and Lucile Packard Foundation.

Exit mobile version