Meta-analysis says food incentives do their job

People will eat more healthy food if prices are lowered and consume less unhealthy food and fewer sugary beverages if they cost more, say researchers who performed a meta-analysis of 30 studies on the issue. Co-author Ashkan Afshin said the meta-analysis demonstrated causality: “Our results show how 10 to 50 percent changes in price of foods and beverages at checkout could influence consumers’ purchasing behaviors over a relatively short period of time.”

A Tufts University release said that in the pooled analysis, each 10 percent decrease in the price of fruit and vegetables was followed by a 14 percent increase in consumption; for other healthy foods, a 10 percent reduction in price led to a 16 percent increase in consumption. Conversely, each 10 percent increase in the cost of sugary drinks led to a 7 percent decrease in consumption and a 10 percent increase in the cost of unhealthy fast food was followed by a 3 percent drop in consumption.

“Our findings suggest that subsidies and taxes are a highly effective tool for normalizing the price of foods toward their true societal costs,” said senior author Dariush Mozaffarian, dean of Tufts’ nutrition school. ” This will not only prevent disease, but also reduce spiraling healthcare costs, which are causing tremendous strain on both private businesses and government budgets.”

Exit mobile version